The Reign of Napoleon
Very few leaders have subjugated an era as meticulously as Napoleon dominated his time. Just like Hitler, alluring, a politician as well as a master of psychology, indeed shaped his time. This study analyses how his policies shaped France as a nation during his reign.
In principal, his career can be attributed the armed and political powers he innate from the Revolution but exploited them for his own motives. While many may perceive him as a mere general, he too was an active administrator that came up with a great deal of internal reforms for instance his revolutionary motto on nationalism. He perceived nationalism as a vital tool meant to earn him loyalty from the French people during his regime. Indeed, it was the spirit of nationalism which had inspired the army to a series incredible of conquests that benefited him to rise to supremacy. This way, loyalty to him meant loyalty to France.
Additionally, during his rule the education system of France was greatly transformed. For instance, four levels of schooling were established. These were the primary, secondary military schools as well as technical schools, (Lavelle, 2003). However, much focus in the schools stressed for conformity and values towards the military. It is projected that that in 1814, over 9000 pupils were schooling contrally to the previous kings’ rule whereby only the privileged went to school.
In addition, France had experienced close a decade full of revolutionary mayhem. This had made the government wobbly as well as corrupt and characteristically unpopular church policies coupled with massive inflation. However, his rule ended the turmoil enabling him to nurture the spirit of liberalism.
On governance, changes were also realized. Initially, rule shifted from kingship to the revolution. But during his era, he became the emperor not to be removed. He chose members to the National assembly, which became the law making body. During this time, men were allowed to vote but ended after 1804 when elections were no more, (Lavelle, 2003).
Conclusively, though pragmatic, he was able to spread nationalism, transform education systems and ending the turmoil of the revolution.