A Fallacy of Comparing and Contrasting Love
Love has been known to be strong and varied. This exposes it as a clarification that an individual gives his or her partner. On the other hand, fallacy refers to a false notion. In the story by Shulman, love is considered a fallacy; the author describes the basic principle of the term fallacy in an interesting manner. According to Walton, a fallacy requires that an argument should be valid and based on some meaning; hence, it should be assumed that the perpetrators of the argument deceive either themselves or other people into thinking that their argument is right and valid (250). The story is about a young man who attended the college of Minnesota during the early 1950’s. The chief protagonist who narrates the story is depicted as very keen and calculating, very acute and astute person whose main aim in the story is to obtain from his roommate and friend called Petey Burch, a young girl known as Polly Epsy. In the story by Shulman, we see how Petey is deceived, and the author describes Petey as an illogical person who desperately yearns for a raccoon coat and plans with the story teller on how he could attain a coat in exchange of Polly. This was because; men were recognized at the time by the possession of the coat. Polly is described as a beautiful girl who influences the main character as he considers being a girl that would fit his future state. The main character believes that when he becomes a lawyer, he yearns to have a beautiful woman as a wife just as good lawyers do. The only problem to his plan was that Polly did not happen to a bright girl on campus much to the contrary.
The story of love is a fallacy revolves around a young man who tried to use the intelligence he has to outwit his classmate who he had assumed was not a very bright guy. When trying to steal his roommates girl, who his roommate was what he had called a “faddist” and/or a bandwagon follower. His cleverness then turns to fight him in the butt when teaching Polly, the not-so-bright girl, logic. She turns out to know the fallacies extremely well, and when he decides she’s very smart to be his girlfriend, she has already decided to go steady with his roommate. This boy committed his fallacies in this story and in the end, what goes around has to comes around as well.
In this paper, the clever finality of this story which Shulman impacts on the narrator is that Polly has actually been trained well enough to refute the man trying to impose his authority over her. According to this paper, Polly uses all the tactics taught to her to attack the narrator. She plausibly brings down his sexism as a result of the logic she has learnt.
“In this literary study the short story “Love is a Fallacy” by Max Shulman will be analyzed. Shulman argues out his points basing them on logic. He critically points out how the narrator gets to mistreat people of his opposite sex . However, the narrator’s inability to realize the hypocrisy he has in gaining a “trophy wife” through treachery devolves his misogynist behaviors and actions. In the real meaning, “Love is a Fallacy” uses sexism, hypocrisy and logic to create a devolving tale of a student in college who has an inferior intellect. The beginning of Shulman’s story reflects a young boy who is an arrogant student. He thinks of himself being superior to his classmates, Petey B. The first part of the his story goes around the narrator’s inability to see how Petey Bellow is easily susceptible to `fads’ on college Shulman writes: A nice enough fellow, you understand, but nothing upstairs.”
Many characters in the Romeo, and Juliet by Shakespeare plays vital roles are in the play. For instance, Rosaline, Apothecary, and Friar. However, this essay will focus on Romeo, Juliet, and Rosalina. Romeo is the main protagonist in this story, the author, introduces Romeo Montague just after the scene of the fight between the two servants from different families in Verona ,all the same , rosalina is not seen in the play. As the story begins, we are able to see Romeo falling in love with Rosalina but does not know her very well but fell in love with her at the first sight. In the story, Romeo even uses Rosalina when describing beauty. He stated that he would conjure the Ape by the beauty of Rosaline, particularly the bright eyes she had. However, the author stated that Romeo could not be with Rosaline because she was going to be a nun. However, Juliet Capulet is at a very tender age and had just been informed that a very attractive Verona’s young bachelor has arranged for a wedding with her. Capulet’s residence was taken to be the meeting place . However, Romeo and his friends also planned to attend the Capulet ball in costumes in order to meet Rosalina who was also enlisted as one of the guests. The author stated that Romeo met Juliet instead, and the couple fell madly in love. Later they discovered that they belong to members of rival families but were still affectionately in deep love. The love that Romeo had towards Juliet made him to stay a while after the party under the balcony of Juliet, which they planned their hasty but very genuine marriage.
Romeo met Juliet and fall in love with her. He had a tendency to sneak at the Capulet Orchard to overhear Juliet in order to make a vow to their love in spite of the hatred of Juliet’s family against Romeo and the Montagues. However, Romeo made all the attempts to convince Juliet to know and love him and later their love reached a point where they agreed to marry each other. Later the two lovers met and secretly got married the second day with an assistance of Friar Laurance (Barranger, 23).
In conclusion, a fallacy must be valid and when compared to the story of love by Shulman, the love between Romeo and Juliet used a recommended form of communication since Romeo was able to use the best language to put the feelings of Juliet to test. This feeling was manipulated in a non-threatening way by Romeo to ensure that Juliet loves him. Thus, the use of metaphor by men during seduction acts as an invitation that can render the woman to pretend that she does not get to comprehend the language of the man language, hence forcing the man to retreat without losing honor (Boase 23). The author breaks away from the normal process of courtship in which a woman would always be required to act in a modest way and shy to ensure that her suitor was very honest and sincere. This provides a sharp contrast to the story of love is a fallacy since lovers are able to skip a prolonged part or courtship and encompass plain talk in their conversations about their relationships. The love that Romeo and Juliet shared, expressesed the view of religion of love that is passionate, as well as, affectionate and only can only lead to marriage or end in death that prevents the lovers from losing the sympathy from their perceived audiences. In conclusion,what varies in the two two stories is, the story by Shulman teaches about the basic principles of fallacy, whereas, in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, the story truly equates affectionate love to death (Arafay, 23).